Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

TEST
YOUR PC

ADD TO PC
BUILD

Asus MAXIMUS V EXTREME

Performance Results


Gaming 65% Destroyer	Desktop 79% Battleship	Workstation 51% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (16th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 84 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	92.1% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	48.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (36%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus MAXIMUS V EXTREME (all builds)
Memory	6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	2560 x 1600 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20120807
Uptime	4.6 Days
Run Date	Mar 21 '22 at 15:00
Run Duration	268 Seconds
Run User	BRN-User
Background CPU	36%

Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3770K-$150 165,979 User benchmarks, average bench 72% LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)	70.2% Very good	Memory 92.1 1-Core 99.8 2-Core 175 73% 122 Pts	4-Core 263 8-Core 384 40% 324 Pts	64-Core 391 24% 391 Pts
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 70.2% Great: 83%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195 1,082,454 User benchmarks, average bench 102% Nvidia(10DE 119E) CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 511.65 Performing below potential (6^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	92.1% Outstanding	Lighting 115 Reflection 119 Parallax 139 94% 124 fps	MRender 102 Gravity 131 Splatting 97.8 89% 110 fps
Poor: 93% ↑ This bench: 92.1% Great: 110%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$85 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 90GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 207 170 174 77 93 92 MB/s Performing way below expectations (0^th percentile)	48.8% Average	Read 310 Write 261 Mixed 242 SusWrite 136 53% 237 MB/s	4K Read 21.8 4K Write 13.7 4K Mixed 22.3 69% 19.3 MB/s	DQ Read 234 DQ Write 54 DQ Mixed 60 66% 116 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 48.8% Great: 134%
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$234 154,399 User benchmarks, average bench 110% 162GB free Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 312 261 281 282 333 354 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	73.5% Very good	Read 445 Write 375 Mixed 368 SusWrite 304 84% 373 MB/s	4K Read 35.2 4K Write 24.9 4K Mixed 21.7 94% 27.3 MB/s	DQ Read 368 DQ Write 33.8 DQ Mixed 69.4 84% 157 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 73.5% Great: 133%
Samsung 840 Evo 1TB-$199 23,857 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 67GB free Firmware: EXT0BB0Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 298 251 270 266 113 126 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	64.5% Good	Read 421 Write 358 Mixed 284 SusWrite 221 72% 321 MB/s	4K Read 33.5 4K Write 15 4K Mixed 19.5 84% 22.7 MB/s	DQ Read 383 DQ Write 25.5 DQ Mixed 64.7 82% 158 MB/s
Poor: 78% ↑ This bench: 64.5% Great: 126%
WD Blue 3TB (2015)-$64 75,644 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 2TB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 103 109 103 110 115 MB/s Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)	65.5% Good	Read 121 Write 120 Mixed 65.1 SusWrite 107 76% 103 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.9 174% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 65.5% Great: 96%
WD WD10EACS-00ZJB0 1TB 28,352 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 78GB free Firmware: 01.01B01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 65 62 68 61 68 68 MB/s Performing as expected (54^th percentile)	38.6% Below average	Read 69.3 Write 65.3 Mixed 51.6 SusWrite 65.1 46% 62.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.6 113% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 38.6% Great: 51%
WDC WD30 EFRX-68EUZN0 3TB 50 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 2TB free, PID 0539 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.4 5.4 6 5.1 5.4 5.4 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	13.4% Very poor	Read 38.2 Write 38 Mixed 31.9 SusWrite 5.4 37% 28.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.9 105% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 13.4% Great: 55%
ST315003 41AS 1.5TB 23 User benchmarks, average bench 33% 1TB free, PID 0539 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 33 36 33 37 37 MB/s Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	18.7% Very poor	Read 39.3 Write 38.9 Mixed 28.9 SusWrite 35.1 48% 35.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 1 94% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 18.7% Great: 48%
WDC WD20 EARS-00MVWB0 2TB 66 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 603GB free, PID 0539 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.3 0.5 0.4 0.5 0.1 3.7 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	10.8% Very poor	Read 36.3 Write 35.1 Mixed 28.2 SusWrite 0.9 32% 25.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.6 81% 1 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 10.8% Great: 43%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GB 28,461 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 4 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing below potential (8^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	43.7% Average	MC Read 15.7 MC Write 15 MC Mixed 13.1 42% 14.6 GB/s	SC Read 12.1 SC Write 13.2 SC Mixed 12.9 36% 12.7 GB/s	Latency 64 62% 64 ns
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 43.7% Great: 76%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical MAXIMUS V EXTREME Builds (Compare 321 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 76%

Battleship

Desktop 80%

Battleship

Workstation 62%

Destroyer

Motherboard: Asus MAXIMUS V EXTREME - $550

CPU
Core i7-3770KIntel $150Bench 72%, 165,979 samples	201x
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	50x
Core i7-2600KIntel $319Bench 71%, 147,533 samples	20x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	27x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $237Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	17x
GTX 1070Nvidia $200Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	17x

SSD
870 EVO 1TBSamsung $107Bench 112%, 129,044 samples	15x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	10x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $85Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	9x

RAM
HyperX DDR3 1866 C10 4x8GBKingstonBench 63%, 12,722 samples	10x
TridentX DDR3 2400 C10 4x8GBG.SKILLBench 74%, 7,519 samples	8x
TridentX DDR3 2400 C10 2x8GBG.SKILLBench 67%, 24,592 samples	8x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 91% - Outstanding

Total price: $1,002

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169	Nvidia RTX 4060 $298	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $209	Nvidia RTX 4070 $500	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350