Today's hottest deals

Asrock X670E Taichi Carrara

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 309%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 117%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 367%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 115%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics278% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive570% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemAsrock X670E Taichi Carrara  (all builds)
MotherboardASRock X670E Taichi Carrara
Memory44.9 GB free of 64 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240726
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 24 '24 at 00:12
Run Duration303 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 7900X3D-$450
AM5, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 4.4 GHz, turbo 5.05 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
115% Outstanding
Memory 81.5
1-Core 216
2-Core 411
123% 236 Pts
4-Core 797
8-Core 1,582
140% 1,190 Pts
64-Core 2,736
169% 2,736 Pts
Poor: 103%
This bench: 115%
Great: 124%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 7900-XTX-$1,000
ASRock(1849 5302) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 24GB, Driver: 24.7.1
Performing below potential (77th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
278% Outstanding
Lighting 371
Reflection 473
Parallax 766
302% 536 fps
MRender 525
Gravity 307
Splatting 476
359% 436 fps
Poor: 221%
This bench: 278%
Great: 294%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial T700 M.2 2TB-$224
1TB free (System drive)
Firmware: PACR5103
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5780 5575 3976 1802 2002 1710 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
570% Outstanding
Read 5,495
Write 5,684
Mixed 3,429
SusWrite 3,474
1,014% 4,521 MB/s
4K Read 60.4
4K Write 128
4K Mixed 82.7
266% 90.5 MB/s
DQ Read 1,764
DQ Write 705
DQ Mixed 1,535
1,057% 1,335 MB/s
Poor: 475%
This bench: 570%
Great: 926%
Crucial MX500 1TB-$79
931GB free
Firmware: M3CR023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 464 464 464 464 462 463 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
113% Outstanding
Read 500
Write 454
Mixed 433
SusWrite 464
104% 463 MB/s
4K Read 33.8
4K Write 84.3
4K Mixed 45.7
154% 54.6 MB/s
DQ Read 384
DQ Write 368
DQ Mixed 298
245% 350 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 113%
Great: 125%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$75
931GB free
Firmware: 4B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2068 2073 2074 2079 2072 1646 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
351% Outstanding
Read 2221
Write 2,072
Mixed 2,015
SusWrite 2,002
468% 2,077 MB/s
4K Read 56.3
4K Write 94.9
4K Mixed 66.2
220% 72.5 MB/s
DQ Read 1,810
DQ Write 1410
DQ Mixed 1,609
1,204% 1,610 MB/s
Poor: 188%
This bench: 351%
Great: 410%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$75
931GB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1521 1523 1519 1471 1464 1461 MB/s
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
324% Outstanding
Read 2,281
Write 1,479
Mixed 1,543
SusWrite 1,493
380% 1,699 MB/s
4K Read 53.9
4K Write 106
4K Mixed 69.3
226% 76.4 MB/s
DQ Read 1,792
DQ Write 1,401
DQ Mixed 1,561
1,178% 1,585 MB/s
Poor: 188%
This bench: 324%
Great: 410%
Seagate IronWolf 4TB (2016)-$74
3.5TB free
Firmware: SC60
SusWrite @10s intervals: 162 148 168 177 164 176 MB/s
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
97.5% Outstanding
Read 174
Write 164
Mixed 81.4
SusWrite 166
107% 146 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.8
151% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 97.5%
Great: 108%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMH64GX5M4B5600Z36 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM 22h 4800 MHz clocked @ 5600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
251% Outstanding
MC Read 156
MC Write 63.5
MC Mixed 72.8
278% 97.3 GB/s
SC Read 48
SC Write 72.1
SC Mixed 55.4
167% 58.5 GB/s
Latency 77.6
52% 77.6 ns
Poor: 139%
This bench: 251%
Great: 251%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 56 144 27.2" 2560 1440 GSM5B9A 27GN950
Typical X670E Taichi Carrara Builds (Compare 25 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 297%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 119%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 374%
UFO

System: Asrock X670E Taichi Carrara

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 95% - Outstanding Total price: $1,793
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $144
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $246Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback