bin bin

Performance Results


Gaming 11% Tree trunk	Desktop 72% Battleship	Workstation 10% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	7.2% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	92.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System
Motherboard	Intel DH67CL
Memory	10 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20121204
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 11 '17 at 16:35
Run Duration	593 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	2%

PC Performing as expected (56^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-2500 82,538 User benchmarks, average bench 63% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	76.7% Very good	Memory 91.9 1-Core 93 2-Core 184 73% 123 Pts	4-Core 357 8-Core 358 48% 357 Pts	64-Core 357 22% 357 Pts
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 76.7% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 730 164,888 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Gigabyte(1458 3693) 2GB CLim: 901 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 376.33 Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	7.2% Terrible	Lighting 9.1 Reflection 7.88 Parallax 9.25 7% 8.74 fps	MRender 10.9 Gravity 7.37 Splatting 7.22 7% 8.48 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 7.2% Great: 7%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 120GB-$80 69,224 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 68GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (34^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 58 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 57 (B1) Unknown 99 99 8 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 64 56 36 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 99 99 274 (EB) Unknown 99 99 18 (F1) Unknown 99 99 2082112461	92.8% Outstanding	Read 511 Write 399 Mixed 414 98% 441 MB/s	4K Read 29 4K Write 68.4 4K Mixed 35.6 126% 44.3 MB/s	DQ Read 252 DQ Write 156 DQ Mixed 91 98% 166 MB/s
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 92.8% Great: 115%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$60 344,862 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 1TB free Firmware: MX4OABB0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (52^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 138 138 74 (03) Spinup time 129 129 21494038820 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 3557 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 124 124 33 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 14827 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 2184 (C0) Power-off retract count 97 97 3616 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 97 97 3616 (C2) HDA temperature 166 166 231928758308 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 2	89.1% Excellent	Read 160 Write 151 Mixed 134 111% 148 MB/s	4K Read 1.05 4K Write 0.59 4K Mixed 0.23 81% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 89.1% Great: 108%
Seagate ST3160023AS 160GB-$24 4,798 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 46GB free Firmware: 3.00 Max speed: SATA 1.0 150 MB/s Performing as expected (58^th percentile)	26.4% Poor	Read 42.4 Write 49.4 Mixed 48.5 35% 46.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.41 4K Write 1.35 4K Mixed 0.4 87% 0.72 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 26.4% Great: 32%
Samsung HD160JJ 160GB-$85 5,008 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 16GB free Firmware: ZM100-41 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing as expected (53^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 253 100 0 (03) Spinup time 100 100 5824 (04) Start/Stop count 86 86 14463 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 1 (07) Seek error rate 253 253 0 (08) Seek timer performance 253 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 25268 (0A) Spinup retry count 253 253 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 253 253 0 (0C) Power cycle count 93 93 7103 (BB) vendor-specific 73 73 28 (BE) vendor-specific 142 94 32 (C2) HDA temperature 142 94 32 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 9681 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 1 (C5) Current pending sector count 253 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 253 253 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 1 (C8) Write error rate 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 253 100 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 253 253 0	25% Poor	Read 48.6 Write 38.3 Mixed 50 35% 45.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.42 4K Write 1.15 4K Mixed 0.28 70% 0.62 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 25% Great: 33%
Seagate ST3160023AS 160GB-$24 4,798 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 14GB free Firmware: 3.00 Max speed: SATA 1.0 150 MB/s Performing below expectations (36^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 57 42 120120749 (03) Spinup time 96 96 0 (04) Start/Stop count 80 80 20992 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 62 60 1460883138299 (09) Power-on hours count 71 71 25943 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 91 91 9487 (C2) HDA temperature 34 47 47244640290 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 57 42 120120749 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 198 6 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 100 253 0	22.6% Poor	Read 30 Write 48.5 Mixed 36.6 29% 38.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.45 4K Write 1.24 4K Mixed 0.4 86% 0.69 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 22.6% Great: 32%
Hitachi HDT721010SLA360 1TB 108 User benchmarks, average bench 18% 256GB free, PID 2329 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing as expected (56^th percentile)	17.7% Very poor	Read 34 Write 33.5 Mixed 14.3 33% 27.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.57 4K Write 1.74 4K Mixed 0.31 72% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 17.7% Great: 21%
SAMSUNG HD502HI 500GB 81 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 191GB free, PID 2329 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)	15.4% Very poor	Read 31.2 Write 25.9 Mixed 27.7 36% 28.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.34 4K Write 1.66 4K Mixed 0.26 67% 0.75 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 15.4% Great: 20%
EPSON Stylus Storage 8GB 14 User benchmarks, average bench 2% 6GB free, PID null Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	1.79% Terrible	Read 5.44 Write 3.22 Mixed 3.41 5% 4.02 MB/s	4K Read 1.13 4K Write 0.009 4K Mixed 0.009 5% 0.38 MB/s
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 1.79% Great: 2%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Nanya NT2GC64B88B0NF-CG CL9-9-9 DDR3 1600 NT2GC64B88B0NF-CG CL9-9-9 DDR3 1600 12GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 1333, 1600, 1333, 1600 MHz 2048, 4096, 2048, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	52.4% Above average	MC Read 17.9 MC Write 19.2 MC Mixed 16.6 51% 17.9 GB/s	SC Read 13.9 SC Write 16.6 SC Mixed 16 44% 15.5 GB/s	Latency 64.3 62% 64.3 ns
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 52.4% Great: 53%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,548 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 61%

Destroyer

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

CPU
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	2,058x
Core i7-2600Intel $201Bench 67%, 185,630 samples	1,586x
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples	947x

GPU
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	1,322x
SVGA 3DVmwareBench 20%, 11,474 samples	1,145x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	1,060x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	830x
Virtual NVMe Disk 64GBVmwareBench 62%, 2,103 samples	458x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	433x

RAM
2x2GBUnknownBench 20%, 446,702 samples	521x
4x2GBUnknownBench 25%, 183,252 samples	379x
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples	300x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $325

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4070 $520	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353