Today's hottest deals

Asus VANGUARD B85

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics1.86% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardAsus VANGUARD B85  (all builds)
Memory10.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20150401
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateApr 06 '20 at 16:28
Run Duration442 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron G1850-$23
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
54.7% Above average
Memory 81.6
1-Core 81
2-Core 150
63% 104 Pts
4-Core 163
8-Core 166
22% 165 Pts
64-Core 150
9% 150 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 54.7%
Great: 60%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (G4 Pentium/Celeron 1.05/1.15 GHz)
Asus(1043 8534) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.14.4264
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
1.86% Terrible
Lighting 2
Reflection 3.42
Parallax 2.94
2% 2.79 fps
MRender 3.57
Gravity 1.07
Splatting 3.61
2% 2.75 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.86%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 128GB-$58
15GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXM0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 514
Write 468
Mixed 349
99% 444 MB/s
4K Read 39.1
4K Write 127
4K Mixed 47.9
188% 71.4 MB/s
DQ Read 383
DQ Write 344
DQ Mixed 47.9
122% 258 MB/s
Poor: 71% Great: 119%
WD Red 4TB (2013)-$100
147GB free
Firmware: 82.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 87 87 87 87 86 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
50.1% Above average
Read 87.6
Write 84.6
Mixed 66.8
SusWrite 86.6
60% 81.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.9
174% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 50.1%
Great: 100%
WDC WD10 0EMAZ-00WJTA0 10TB
5.5TB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 167 157 146 155 164 163 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
94.4% Outstanding
Read 203
Write 203
Mixed 81.5
SusWrite 159
212% 162 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 9.8
4K Mixed 0.9
369% 4.03 MB/s
DQ Read 1.6
DQ Write 6.1
DQ Mixed 1.1
251% 2.93 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 94.4%
Great: 94%
WDC WD60 EFRX-68MYMN1 6TB
27GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.8 2 2.6 0.6 0.2 1.7 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
31% Below average
Read 146
Write 141
Mixed 78.3
SusWrite 1.5
113% 91.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 3
4K Mixed 1
139% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 31%
Great: 57%
WDC WD10 0EZAZ-11TDBA0 10TB
299GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 21 23 21 21 19 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
43.7% Average
Read 162
Write 161
Mixed 68.3
SusWrite 21.3
127% 103 MB/s
4K Read 2.4
4K Write 4.9
4K Mixed 1
210% 2.77 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 43.7%
Great: 54%
WDC WD60 EFRX-68L0BN1 6TB
86GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.6 0.3 0.7 0.1 0 2.6 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
26.6% Poor
Read 122
Write 93.9
Mixed 65.1
SusWrite 0.7
84% 70.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1
132% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 26.6%
Great: 54%
WDC WD80 EFZX-68UW8N0 8TB
35GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.3 0.6 0.8 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
26.7% Poor
Read 138
Write 146
Mixed 66.8
SusWrite 0.4
108% 87.7 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 1.3
119% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 26.7%
Great: 48%
HGST HDN 728080ALE604 8TB
88GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.6 0.3 0.7 0.1 0 2.3 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
42.5% Average
Read 206
Write 206
Mixed 70
SusWrite 0.7
145% 121 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 4
4K Mixed 0.9
171% 2 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 42.5%
Great: 48%
HGST HUH 721010ALE600 10TB
1TB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.6 1 1.2 0.3 0 30 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
45.9% Average
Read 190
Write 196
Mixed 73.8
SusWrite 5.7
142% 116 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 5.5
4K Mixed 1.2
232% 2.57 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 45.9%
Great: 46%
WDC WD60 EFRX-68L0BN1 6TB
4GB free, PID null
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 153
Write 126
Mixed 77.1
142% 119 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 1.1
139% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 22% Great: 54%
WDC WD10 0EMAZ-00WJTA0 10TB
457GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.9 4.6 5.4 4.3 4.3 8.3 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
30.5% Below average
Read 96.9
Write 109
Mixed 55.7
SusWrite 5.3
84% 66.7 MB/s
4K Read 2.3
4K Write 4.8
4K Mixed 1.3
216% 2.8 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 30.5%
Great: 85%
WDC WD50 EZRZ-32GZ5B1 5TB
3TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.8 4.6 5.3 4.3 4.3 8.5 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
32.5% Below average
Read 151
Write 125
Mixed 74.5
SusWrite 5.3
107% 89 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 3
4K Mixed 1
139% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 32.5%
Great: 58%
WDC WD50 EZRZ-32GZ5B1 5TB
513GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5 4.6 5.4 4.3 4.3 8.2 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
29.4% Poor
Read 134
Write 106
Mixed 71.7
SusWrite 5.3
96% 79.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1
133% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 29.4%
Great: 58%
WDC WD40 EZRX-00SPEB0 4TB
168GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.9 4.6 5.4 4.3 4.3 8.3 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
24.3% Poor
Read 105
Write 101
Mixed 60.9
SusWrite 5.3
85% 68.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 0.9
119% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 24.3%
Great: 61%
WDC WD40 EZRX-00SPEB0 4TB
70GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 116 129 111 130 133 131 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
57.2% Above average
Read 152
Write 145
Mixed 79
SusWrite 125
166% 125 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1
122% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 57.2%
Great: 61%
WDC WD10 0EZAZ-11TDBA0 10TB
2.5TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 84 84 86 86 86 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
67.6% Good
Read 132
Write 131
Mixed 63.6
SusWrite 84.5
134% 103 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 9.7
4K Mixed 1
368% 3.9 MB/s
DQ Read 0.5
DQ Write 5.5
DQ Mixed 1.3
233% 2.43 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 67.6%
Great: 86%
WDC WD80 EZAZ-11TDBA0 8TB
692GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 84 84 86 86 86 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
56.1% Above average
Read 157
Write 167
Mixed 71.5
SusWrite 84.4
156% 120 MB/s
4K Read 2.3
4K Write 4.7
4K Mixed 1.2
209% 2.73 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 56.1%
Great: 62%
WDC WD50 EZRZ-00GZ5B1 5TB
989GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 84 84 86 86 86 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
46.9% Average
Read 136
Write 118
Mixed 76.8
SusWrite 84.4
135% 104 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1
133% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 46.9%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 1400 MHz
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
29.7% Poor
MC Read 10.1
MC Write 10.3
MC Mixed 8.3
27% 9.57 GB/s
SC Read 7.7
SC Write 10
SC Mixed 9.3
26% 9 GB/s
Latency 77.6
52% 77.6 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 29.7%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical VANGUARD B85 Builds (Compare 438 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus VANGUARD B85 - $7,816

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 77% - Very good Total price: $7,960
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $129
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback