Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-Z370 AORUS Gaming 3

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 104%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics32.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z370 AORUS Gaming 3  (all builds)
Memory11 GB free of 16 GB @ 3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171109
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateJul 29 '18 at 13:34
Run Duration335 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU5%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700K-$160
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Memory 96.2
1-Core 150
2-Core 300
100% 182 Pts
4-Core 598
8-Core 927
94% 763 Pts
64-Core 1,239
77% 1,239 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 104%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 398.36
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
32.5% Below average
Lighting 40.8
Reflection 32.1
Parallax 38.3
33% 37.1 fps
MRender 38.7
Gravity 38.8
Splatting 37
31% 38.2 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 32.5%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$84
71GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,546
Write 2,353
Mixed 1,655
486% 2,185 MB/s
4K Read 66.7
4K Write 171
4K Mixed 91.9
309% 110 MB/s
DQ Read 1,478
DQ Write 1,271
DQ Mixed 1,331
1,009% 1,360 MB/s
Poor: 199% Great: 340%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$91
804GB free
Firmware: CC9E
SusWrite @10s intervals: 130 145 139 145 140 146 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
75.1% Very good
Read 121
Write 90.8
Mixed 83.3
SusWrite 141
80% 109 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.7
126% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 75.1%
Great: 113%
Seagate Barracuda Desktop 5TB-$180
1TB free
Firmware: CC49
SusWrite @10s intervals: 109 123 117 120 125 126 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
63.8% Good
Read 99.9
Write 112
Mixed 25.2
SusWrite 120
64% 89.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 8
4K Mixed 0.6
252% 3.17 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 63.8%
Great: 90%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$79
1.5TB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 110 111 113 114 113 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
62.1% Good
Read 104
Write 96.5
Mixed 66.6
SusWrite 112
70% 94.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.5
138% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 62.1%
Great: 67%
WD WD80EMAZ-00WJTA0 8TB
2TB free
Firmware: 83.H0A83
SusWrite @10s intervals: 173 173 167 160 170 165 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
88.8% Excellent
Read 140
Write 158
Mixed 97.2
SusWrite 168
104% 141 MB/s
4K Read 1.9
4K Write 4.9
4K Mixed 1.1
292% 2.63 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 88.8%
Great: 105%
WD Green 5TB (2014)-$170
1.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 114 117 115 117 118 118 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
73.4% Very good
Read 139
Write 128
Mixed 95.1
SusWrite 116
88% 120 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 3
4K Mixed 0.9
189% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 73.4%
Great: 97%
WDC WD30 EZRX-00DC0B0 3TB
1.5TB free, PID 0539
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 78 80 80 80 80 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
42.7% Average
Read 117
Write 117
Mixed 65.6
SusWrite 79.1
124% 94.5 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 0.9
126% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 42.7%
Great: 55%
ST6000DX 000-1H217Z 6TB
94GB free, PID 0539
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 26 27 27 27 28 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
24.6% Poor
Read 81.3
Write 117
Mixed 61.9
SusWrite 26.6
96% 71.8 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 1
113% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 25%
This bench: 24.6%
Great: 45%
ST5000DM 000-1FK178 5TB
1.5TB free, PID 0539
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 26 27 27 27 28 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
53.7% Above average
Read 98.6
Write 110
Mixed 82.1
SusWrite 26.5
104% 79.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 10.9
4K Mixed 0.7
396% 4.03 MB/s
DQ Read 0.4
DQ Write 10.8
DQ Mixed 0.9
399% 4.03 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 53.7%
Great: 82%
ST5000DM 000-1FK178 5TB
698GB free, PID 0539
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 26 27 27 27 28 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
49.3% Average
Read 76.3
Write 91.9
Mixed 84.3
SusWrite 26.6
94% 69.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 10.5
4K Mixed 0.7
383% 3.93 MB/s
DQ Read 0.3
DQ Write 10.6
DQ Mixed 0.8
389% 3.9 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 49.3%
Great: 82%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Aegis DDR4 3000 C16 2x8GB-$30
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
53% Above average
MC Read 19
MC Write 18.3
MC Mixed 14.4
49% 17.2 GB/s
SC Read 15.5
SC Write 19.9
SC Mixed 18.1
51% 17.8 GB/s
Latency 53.2
75% 53.2 ns
Poor: 62%
This bench: 53%
Great: 103%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z370 AORUS Gaming 3 Builds (Compare 1,715 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 94%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 86%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z370 AORUS Gaming 3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 116% - Outstanding Total price: $512
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $129
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback