Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-Z370 AORUS Gaming 3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 106%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 40%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 102%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics32.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive310% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z370 AORUS Gaming 3  (all builds)
Memory28.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171109
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 03 '19 at 16:52
Run Duration322 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU5%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700K-$160
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Memory 96.6
1-Core 150
2-Core 300
100% 182 Pts
4-Core 575
8-Core 934
92% 754 Pts
64-Core 1,251
77% 1,251 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 102%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 398.82
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
32.4% Below average
Lighting 40.5
Reflection 32
Parallax 38.2
33% 36.9 fps
MRender 38.4
Gravity 38.9
Splatting 37.1
31% 38.2 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 32.4%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$84
287GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 833 640 626 616 602 614 MB/s
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
310% Outstanding
Read 2,585
Write 2,379
Mixed 1,677
SusWrite 655
407% 1,824 MB/s
4K Read 70.9
4K Write 185
4K Mixed 97.6
331% 118 MB/s
DQ Read 1,556
DQ Write 1,338
DQ Mixed 1,398
1,061% 1,431 MB/s
Poor: 199%
This bench: 310%
Great: 340%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$91
1.5TB free
Firmware: CC9E
SusWrite @10s intervals: 119 130 128 134 128 134 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
79.2% Very good
Read 147
Write 119
Mixed 74.6
SusWrite 129
86% 117 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.7
148% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 79.2%
Great: 113%
Seagate Barracuda Desktop 5TB-$180
1.5TB free
Firmware: CC49
SusWrite @10s intervals: 128 132 134 136 127 133 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
61.9% Good
Read 82.8
Write 113
Mixed 25.6
SusWrite 132
64% 88.3 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 4.6
4K Mixed 0.8
232% 2.27 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 61.9%
Great: 90%
WD WD80EMAZ-00WJTA0 8TB
761GB free
Firmware: 83.H0A83
SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 36 45 107 104 110 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
53.5% Above average
Read 100
Write 110
Mixed 76.5
SusWrite 84.8
69% 92.9 MB/s
4K Read 1.6
4K Write 5
4K Mixed 1.3
304% 2.63 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 53.5%
Great: 105%
WD Green 5TB (2014)-$170
1TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 111 114 114 108 113 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
75.3% Very good
Read 150
Write 130
Mixed 93.4
SusWrite 112
89% 121 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1
195% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 75.3%
Great: 97%
Seagate Archive HDD 8TB (2015)-$149
7.5TB free
Firmware: AR15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 185 189 192 187 188 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 21% Great: 87%
WDC WD30 EZRX-00DC0B0 3TB
1TB free, PID 0539
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 52 79 40 0 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
33.3% Below average
Read 118
Write 115
Mixed 60.4
SusWrite 36.7
105% 82.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 0.9
122% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 33.3%
Great: 55%
ST6000DX 000-1H217Z 6TB
2.5TB free, PID 0539
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 33 0 53 113 100 112 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
45.3% Average
Read 160
Write 126
Mixed 85.3
SusWrite 68.5
139% 110 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.9
111% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 25%
This bench: 45.3%
Great: 45%
ST5000DM 000-1FK178 5TB
661GB free, PID 0539
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 79 96 113 100 108 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
65.6% Good
Read 81.2
Write 120
Mixed 80.5
SusWrite 97
133% 94.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 10.6
4K Mixed 0.7
386% 3.93 MB/s
DQ Read 0.3
DQ Write 10.8
DQ Mixed 0.7
392% 3.93 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 65.6%
Great: 82%
ST5000DM 000-1FK178 5TB
1.5TB free, PID 0539
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0 0 0.1 0 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
43.5% Average
Read 76.4
Write 90.4
Mixed 83.7
SusWrite 0.2
83% 62.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 10.5
4K Mixed 0.6
379% 3.87 MB/s
DQ Read 0.3
DQ Write 10.8
DQ Mixed 0.9
399% 4 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 43.5%
Great: 82%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3000 C16 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
97.2% Outstanding
MC Read 35.4
MC Write 37.6
MC Mixed 28.3
96% 33.8 GB/s
SC Read 22.6
SC Write 43.1
SC Mixed 30.8
92% 32.2 GB/s
Latency 52
77% 52 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 97.2%
Great: 105%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z370 AORUS Gaming 3 Builds (Compare 1,715 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 94%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 86%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z370 AORUS Gaming 3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 116% - Outstanding Total price: $512
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $129
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback